Scenario #1
Ranking competences of RFCDC

Aims / objectives
The aim is to find out which of the competences are particularly relevant in one's own work or for one's own target group and which are, perhaps, less relevant.
Description of the method
- Every educator looks at the “butterfly” model of the RFCDC individually and works on the following question: Which five competences are especially relevant for your educational work? Write down the five competences you have chosen. (10 minutes)
- Reflection in groups of four educators on some guiding questions. (35 minutes)
- All groups come together to share the results of their discussions. (15 minutes)
Overview
Name of the method | Ranking competences of RFCDC |
Target group | Social and youth workers / teachers |
Duration | 1 hour |
Spatial requirements | Seminar room with possibility to work in small groups |
Competences | Self-reflection; depending on the choice of social/youth workers |
Objectives | Awareness about the concrete needs and use of the competences |
Method description | Participants choose their 5 most relevant competences, reflection in groups and discussion in the plenary |
Social work context | Useful for social and youth workers |
Preparation | Chart of the “butterfly” model of competences (see in the relevant section of this handbook); moderation cards, flipchart |
Risks | No special risks |
Concept / application | Used by the Vienna Forum for Human Rights and Democracy |
References | Ole Jantschek and Hanna Lorenzen, as applied in: The Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture in the Non-formal Educational (p. 74) |
Check our Partners




